4.3 Article

Expression of PROX1 Is a Common Feature of High-Grade Malignant Astrocytic Gliomas

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181ca4767

关键词

Astrocytoma; beta III-tubulin; Diagnostic marker; Glioblastoma; Immunohistochemistry; Neuronal marker; PROX1

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. Swedish Research Council-Medicine
  3. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation
  4. Cancer Society in Stockholm
  5. Karolinska Institutet
  6. Karolinska University Hospital
  7. Ake Wiberg's Foundation
  8. Magnus Bergvall's Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PROX1 is a prospero-related transcription factor that plays a critical role in the development of various organs including the mammalian lymphatic and central nervous systems; it controls cell proliferation and differentiation through different transcription pathways and has both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive functions. We investigated PROM expression patterns in 56 human astrocytic gliomas of different grades using immunohistochemistry. An average of 79% of cells in World Health Organization Grade IV (glioblastoma, n = 15) and 57% of cells in World Health Organization Grade III (anaplastic astrocytoma, n = 13) were strongly PROX1 positive; low-grade diffuse astrocytomas (Grade 11, n = 13) had 21% of cells that were strongly positive; Grade I tumors (n = 15) had 1.5%; and non-neoplastic brain tissue (n = 15) had 3.7% of cells that were PROX1 positive. Double immunolabeling showed that PROX1+ cells in glioblastomas frequently coexpressed early neuronal proteins MAP2 and beta III-tubulin but not the mature neuronal marker protein NeuN. Analyses of coexpression with proliferation markers suggest that PROX1+ cells have a marginally lower rate of proliferation than other turner cells but are still mitotically active. We conclude that PROX1 may constitute a useful tool for the diagnosis and grading of astrocytic gliomas and for distinguishing Grade III and Grade IV tumors from Grade I and Grade II tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据