4.7 Article

Higher ambulatory blood pressure relates to enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces in first-ever lacunar stroke patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 260, 期 1, 页码 115-121

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6598-z

关键词

Enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces; Blood pressure; Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Cerebral small vessel disease; Enlarged perivascular spaces

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces (EVRS) are considered to be a sign of cerebral small vessel disease. Hypertension is an important risk factor for cerebral small vessel disease, whereas ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is the strongest predictor of hypertension-related brain damage. However, the association between ambulatory BP levels and EVRS has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the association between ambulatory BP levels and EVRS. In 143 first-ever lacunar stroke patients, we performed 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring after the acute stroke phase. On brain MRI we counted EVRS in the basal ganglia and the centrum semiovale. We graded the number of EVRS at each level into a three-category severity scale. We assessed the association between BP levels and EVRS by ordinal regression analysis. After adjusting for age, sex, extensive white matter lesions, and asymptomatic lacunar infarcts, higher day systolic (OR 1.21; 95 % CI 1.00-1.46 per 10 mmHg), day diastolic (1.18; 95 % CI 1.02-1.37 per 5 mmHg) and 24-h diastolic (OR 1.18; 95 % CI 1.01-1.37 per 5 mmHg) ambulatory BP levels were associated with EVRS at the basal ganglia level. No relation was found between ambulatory BP levels and EVRS in the centrum semiovale. Higher day ambulatory BP levels are associated with EVRS in the basal ganglia. This association was independent of the presence of extensive white matter lesions and asymptomatic lacunar infarcts. Our results imply that basal ganglia EVRS should be regarded as a separate manifestation of BP-related brain damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据