4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Levodopa-induced dyskinesias and their management

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 32-41

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-008-4006-5

关键词

Parkinson's disease; dyskinesias; levodopa; dopamine agonists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and rationale for managing dyskinesias associated with Parkinson's disease. These are a common clinical problem occurring in up to 90% of patients and more frequently affect those with early-onset. Dyskinesias have a negative impact on quality of life and are an important cause of disability. Their precise etiology is still poorly understood, although it is recognized that dopaminergic pre-synaptic and post-synaptic mechanisms are involved together with extra-dopaminergic factors. The phenomenology of dyskinesias encompasses a variable mixture of two prevalent features: dystonia and chorea. We have studied their time course following a single acute levodopa challenge and have found that dystonia occurs throughout the duration of the on period, whereas choreiform movements occur only at the peak of therapeutic dopaminergic motor responses. This allows a schematic relationship to be drawn between a short duration motor response and the occurrence of dystonia and chorea. There is currently no satisfactory treatment for dyskinesias. Managing the therapeutic window does not provide an adequate solution due to the appearance of a dyskinesia threshold dose that narrows the therapeutic margin. High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus probably has some specific anti-dyskinetic action, but is limited by the small number of patients who are candidates for this treatment. Research efforts are currently focused on the development of specific anti-dyskinetic medications. Their availability will certainly change the current clinical practice and will widen again the therapeutic window of dopaminergic medications that has now become too narrow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据