4.4 Article

Photoinactivation of Photosystem II in wild-type and chlorophyll b-less barley leaves: which mechanism dominates depends on experimental circumstances

期刊

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
卷 126, 期 2-3, 页码 399-407

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-015-0167-0

关键词

Chlorophyll fluorescence; P700; Photosystem II; Photoinactivation of Photosystem II; Photoinhibition

资金

  1. Singapore Millennium Fund
  2. ARC [DP120100872]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-XB3-09]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation [31070356]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Action spectra of photoinactivation of Photosystem II (PS II) in wild-type and chlorophyll b-less barley leaf segments were obtained. Photoinactivation of PS II was monitored by the delivery of electrons from PS II to PS I following single-turnover flashes superimposed on continuous far-red light, the time course of photoinactivation yielding a rate coefficient k (i). Susceptibility of PS II to photoinactivation was quantified as the ratio of k (i) to the moderate irradiance (I) of light at each selected wavelength. k (i)/I was very much higher in blue light than in red light. The experimental conditions permitted little excess light energy absorbed by chlorophyll (not utilized in photochemical conversion or dissipated in controlled photoprotection) that could lead to photoinactivation of PS II. Therefore, direct absorption of light by Mn in PS II, rather than by chlorophyll, was more likely to have initiated the much more severe photoinactivation in blue light than in red light. Mutant leaves were ca. 1.5-fold more susceptible to photoinactivation than the wild type. Neither the excess-energy mechanism nor the Mn mechanism can explain this difference. Instead, the much lower chlorophyll content of mutant leaves could have exerted an exacerbating effect, possibly partly due to less mutual shading of chloroplasts in the mutant leaves. In general, which mechanism dominates depends on the experimental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据