4.5 Article

Mice Chronically Infected with Chimeric HIV Resist Peripheral and Brain Superinfection: A Model of Protective Immunity to HIV

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNE PHARMACOLOGY
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 380-387

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11481-011-9316-1

关键词

Mouse model; Chimeric HIV; Superinfection; Adaptive immune responses; HIV neuropathogenesis; Brain

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service [AI 079792, DA 017618, MH 083627, NS 061646-01A1]
  2. Medical Research Council [G1000800d] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infection by some viruses induces immunity to reinfection, providing a means to identify protective epitopes. To investigate resistance to reinfection in an animal model of HIV disease and its control, we employed infection of mice with chimeric HIV, EcoHIV. When immunocompetent mice were infected by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of EcoHIV, they resisted subsequent secondary infection by IP injection, consistent with a systemic antiviral immune response. To investigate the potential role of these responses in restricting neurotropic HIV infection, we established a protocol for efficient EcoHIV expression in the brain following intracranial (IC) inoculation of virus. When mice were inoculated by IP injection and secondarily by IC injection, they also controlled EcoHIV replication in the brain. To investigate their role in EcoHIV antiviral responses, CD8+ T lymphocytes were isolated from spleens of EcoHIV infected and uninfected mice and adoptively transferred to isogenic recipients. Recipients of EcoHIV primed CD8+ cells resisted subsequent EcoHIV infection compared to recipients of cells from uninfected donors. CD8+ spleen cells from EcoHIV-infected mice also mounted modest but significant interferon-gamma responses to two HIV Gag peptide pools. These findings suggest EcoHIV-infected mice may serve as a useful system to investigate the induction of anti-HIV protective immunity for eventual translation to human beings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据