4.4 Article

Antimicrobial effect of photodynamic therapy in carious lesions in vivo, using culture and real-time PCR methods

期刊

PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 401-407

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.06.003

关键词

Photodynamic therapy; Quantitative PCR; Caries; Streptococcus mutans

类别

资金

  1. Fapemig
  2. CNPQ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in carious lesions in vivo by culture and real-time PCR methods. Methods: Ten teeth with deep active carious lesions were selected and five portions of carious dentin were removed for each tooth. Two increments were used as control, to represent the superficial and deep dentin, respectively. Methylene blue at 100 mg/L was placed in contact with the cavity for 5 min, before being irradiated with a halogen light source for 1 min. Then, after PDT, other three portions were removed. The samples were processed in laboratory and the number of viable cfu was obtained. The real-time PCR analyses were performed in two increments of carious dentin, removed before and after PDT. The Streptococcus mutans DNA was isolated from carious dentin samples and amplification and detection of DNA were performed with real-time PCR. The cavities were then restored with glass-ionomer cement. Results: Using conventional culture methods, the results demonstrated that viable bacteria were significantly reduced in all of the agar plates following photosensitization. No difference was found between both groups regarding S. mutans DNA quantification by real-time PCR. Conclusion: Although PDT may not affect the number of S. mutans DNA copies immediately after the treatment, clear reduction of the number of cfu was found. Despite its promising use for eliminating bacteria in dental caries treatment, further studies are necessary to establish an effective clinical protocol for the PDT. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据