4.5 Article

Neurotoxin-induced selective ubiquitination and regulation of MEF2A isoform in neuronal stress response

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 122, 期 6, 页码 1203-1210

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07860.x

关键词

death; dopaminergic neurons; myocyte enhancer factor 2; proteasome; survival; ubiquitination

资金

  1. NIH [ES015317, AG023695, NS048254, ES016731-0002]
  2. Michael J. Fox Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

J. Neurochem. (2012) 122, 12031210. Abstract The myocyte enhancer factor 2AD (MEF2) proteins are members of the MCM1-agamous-deficiens-serum response factor family of transcription factors. Various MEF2 isoform proteins are enriched in neurons and exhibit distinct patterns of expression in different regions of the brain. In neurons, MEF2 functions as a converging factor to regulate many neuronal functions including survival. MEF2 activities are tightly controlled in neurons in response to stress. Whether stress signal may differentially regulate MEF2s remains largely unknown. In this work, we showed that MEF2A, but not MEF2C or MEF2D, was modified by ubiquitination in dopaminergic neuronal cell line SN4741 cells. MEF2A was ubiquitinated at its N-terminus, and the ubiquitination of MEF2A was first detectable in the nuclear compartment and later in the cytoplasm. Ubiquitination of MEF2A correlated with reduced DNA-binding activity and transcriptional activity. More importantly, disturbing the degradation of ubiquitinated MEF2A through proteasome pathway by neurotoxins known to induce Parkinsons disease features in model animals caused accumulation of ubiquitinated MEF2A, reduced MEF2 activity, and impaired cellular viability. Our work thus provides the first evidence to demonstrate an isoforms-specific regulation of MEF2s by ubiquitination-proteasome pathway in dopaminergic neuronal cell by neurotoxins, suggesting that stress signal and cellular context-dependent dysregulation of MEF2s may underlie the loss of neuronal viability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据