4.5 Article

Light induces Fos expression via extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 in melanopsin-expressing PC12 cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 112, 期 3, 页码 797-806

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06504.x

关键词

FOS; G alpha(q/11); melanopsin; mitogen-activated protein kinases; PC12 cells; phototransduction

资金

  1. Danish Biotechnology Center for Cellular Communication
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. NOVO Nordisk Foundation
  4. Danish National Research Foundation
  5. Kobmand i Odense Johan og Hanne Weimann f. Seedorffs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>The photopigment melanopsin is expressed in a subtype of mammalian ganglion cells in the retina that project to the circadian clock in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus to mediate non-visual light information. Melanopsin renders these retinal ganglion cells intrinsically photosensitive and the cells respond to light by a membrane depolarization and induction of the immediate early response gene Fos. Previous studies showed that the light activated melanopsin-induced signaling, the phototransduction, leading to depolarization of the membrane resembles the invertebrate opsins, which involves a G alpha(q/11) coupled phospholipase C activation. However, the signaling proteins mediating melanopsin-induced Fos expression are unresolved. In this study, we examined the phototransduction leading to Fos expression in melanopsin-transfected PC12 cells. A pivotal role of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) was found as pharmacological blockage of this kinase suppressed the light-induced Fos expression. Illumination increased the inositol phosphate turnover and induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 but not the c-Jun N-terminal kinase. The G alpha(q/11) protein inhibitor YM254890 attenuated these intracellular light responses. Our data strongly indicate that G alpha(q/11)-mediated ERK1/2 activation is essential for expression of Fos upon illumination of melanopsin-expressing PC12 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据