4.5 Article

Reduced proteasomal activity contributes to the accumulation of carbonylated proteins in chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 115, 期 6, 页码 1556-1567

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07062.x

关键词

astrocyte; experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; oxidative stress; proteasome; protein carbonylation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS057755]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS057755] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>We have recently shown that several carbonylated proteins, including glial fibrillary acidic protein, beta-actin and beta-tubulin, accumulate within cerebellar astrocytes during the chronic phase of myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)(35-55) peptide-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in C57BL/6 mice. As protein carbonyls cannot be repaired and there is less oxidative stress in chronic than in acute EAE, we hypothesized that the accumulation of carbonylated proteins in these animals may be due to a defect in the degradation of the modified proteins. Alternatively, oxidized proteins in chronic EAE mice may be more resistant to proteolysis. Using lipopolysaccharide-stimulated astrocytes and several protease inhibitors we identified the 20S proteasome as the proteolytic system responsible for the elimination of most oxidized proteins. We also discovered that the chymotrysin-like and caspase-like activities of the 20S proteasome are impaired in chronic EAE, while the amount of proteasome was unchanged. Proteasome failure in these animals was confirmed by the build-up of ubiquitinated proteins, mostly within astrocytes. In a cell-free system, carbonylated proteins from EAE mice with acute and chronic disease seem to be equally sensitive to proteasomal degradation. Altogether, the results support the notion that diminished activity of the 20S proteasome is a major contributor to the accumulation of carbonylated proteins in astrocytes of chronic EAE mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据