4.5 Article

Phase-2 trial of palbociclib in adult patients with recurrent RB1-positive glioblastoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 140, 期 2, 页码 477-483

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2977-3

关键词

Palbociclib; Recurrent glioblastoma; CDK4; 6 inhibitor; Retinoblastoma pathway

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. National Cancer Institute [P50CA097257, R01CA159467]
  3. Accelerated Brain Cancer Cure (ABC2)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IntroductionAlterations in the CDK4/6RB signaling pathway are common causes of cell cycle dysregulation in many cancers, including glioblastoma. Palbociclib is an oral inhibitor of CDK4/6, which leads to phosphorylation of RB1 and cell-cycle arrest. We conducted a two-arm study evaluating efficacy and tissue pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of palbociclib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.MethodsEligibility criteria included confirmation of RB1 proficiency by IHC; 3 relapses; KPS60; no limit on prior treatments. Arm 1 received palbociclib for 7days prior to indicated resection followed by adjuvant palbociclib. Arm 2 received palbociclib without resection. Primary objective was PFS6; secondary included toxicity, OS, and ORR. Exploratory aims included biomarker assessment and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effects in surgical patients.ResultsTotal of 22 patients were enrolled; 6 on Arm 1 and 16 on Arm 2. Trial was stopped early secondary to lack of efficacy, with 95% of evaluable patients progressing within 6months. Median PFS was 5.14 weeks (range 5days-142weeks) and median OS was 15.4weeks (range 2-274weeks). Two patients (10%) had related grade3 AEs. In Arm 1, 5 patients had tissue concentrations of palbociclib felt to be sufficient for biological effect and paired samples available for RB1 IHC. There were no consistent changes in RB1 expression or cell proliferation in the paired tissue.ConclusionIn this trial, despite adequate tissue PK, palbociclib monotherapy was not an effective treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. However, these were heavily pretreated patients and targeting the CDK4/6 pathway may still deserve further exploration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据