4.4 Article

Simultaneous analysis of isoflavones and saponins in Pueraria flowers using HPLC coupled to an evaporative light scattering detector and isolation of a new isoflavone diglucoside

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL MEDICINES
卷 64, 期 3, 页码 313-320

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11418-010-0411-z

关键词

Pueraria flowers; Isoflavone; Saponin; Simultaneous analysis; HPLC; Evaporative light scattering detector

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Pueraria flowers, Puerariae Flos [Puerariae Lobatae Flos (the flowers of P. lobata) and Puerariae Thomsonii Flos (the flowers of P. thomsonii)], have been used as crude drugs to counteract the overconsumption of alcohol in Japan and China. Both types of Puerariae Flos contain a large amount of isoflavones and saponins. Simultaneous analysis of the total saponin and isoflavone fraction within the flowers has proven difficult thus far; however, profile analysis of saponin and isoflavone levels was attempted in this study by using HPLC coupled to an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD). A characteristic peak of kakkalide was common in the chromatograms of extracts originating from the flowers of P. lobata, though original habitats were different. Tiny peaks of saponins were also observed in chromatograms of all specimens derived from P. lobata. In the chromatograms of six out of eight extracts of Puerariae Thomsonii Flos originating from Guangdong, China, characteristic twin peaks corresponding to tectorigenin 7-O-xylosylglucoside and tectoridin were observed. The distinctive twin peaks were not found in the chromatograms of the extracts produced in Hunan and Sichuan. Although the amounts of total saponins and isoflavones obtained from Puerariae Lobatae Flos were almost the same, those of Puerariae Thomsonii Flos varied remarkably and were not related to habitat. A good yield of a new isoflavone glycoside was obtained from some specimens of Puerariae Thomsonii Flos; the structure was determined to be 6-hydroxygenistein 6,7-di-O-glucoside.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据