4.2 Article

Water-Soluble Taurine-Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Induce Less Damage to Mitochondria of RAW 264.7 Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 8008-8016

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2012.6593

关键词

Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes; Cytotoxicity; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Membrane Potential; Cytochrome c; Ca2+

资金

  1. China Minister of Science and Technology 973 project [2011CB933402]
  2. Technology Innovation Programs of Beijing Institute of Science and Technology [PXM2011-178304-112365]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are increasingly used and many studies have already showed their cytotoxicity in different kinds of cell lines, while their mechanism is not fully understood. Mitochondria are the relatively sensitive organelle in response to the stress challenged by the exogenous chemicals. The study aimed to evaluate mitochondrial injury and cytotoxicity in mouse peritoneal macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7) induced by the water-soluble taurine functionalized MWCNTs (tau-MWCNTs) and pristine raw MWCNTs (raw-MWCNTs). The different concentrations including 0, 5, 20, 40 and 80 mu g/ml for both kinds of MWCNTs were adopted. The cytotoxicity and the mitochondrial function were assessed after 12 h and 24 h treatment. The results revealed that both MWCNTs could produce significantly dose-dependent cytotoxicity and mitochondrial injury including the decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential, the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria and the increase of cytoplasm Ca2+ content. The activities of adenosine triphosphatases (ATPase) and succinodehydrogenase (SDH) of mitochondria were all inhibited after MWCNTs treatment. In conclusion, MWCNTs could lead to mitochondrial injury, which might be one possible pathway of apoptotic cell induction. The findings that tau-MWCNTs exhibited less toxicity compared with raw-MWCNTs support a useful approach to reduce the toxicity of MWCNTs by surface-functionization with taurine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据