4.4 Article

A model to estimate the size of nanoparticle agglomerates in gas-solid fluidized beds

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-2055-x

关键词

Van der Waals; Hydrogen bond; Fluidization; Aggregates; Interaction; Nanoparticle processing; Modeling and simulation

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union [279632]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [279632] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The estimation of nanoparticle agglomerates' size in fluidized beds remains an open challenge, mainly due to the difficulty of characterizing the inter-agglomerate van der Waals force. The current approach is to describe micron-sized nanoparticle agglomerates as micron-sized particles with 0.1-0.2-mu m asperities. This simplification does not capture the influence of the particle size on the van der Waals attraction between agglomerates. In this paper, we propose a new description where the agglomerates are micron-sized particles with nanoparticles on the surface, acting as asperities. As opposed to previous models, here the van der Waals force between agglomerates decreases with an increase in the particle size. We have also included an additional force due to the hydrogen bond formation between the surfaces of hydrophilic and dry nanoparticles. The average size of the fluidized agglomerates has been estimated equating the attractive force obtained from this method to the weight of the individual agglomerates. The results have been compared to 54 experimental values, most of them collected from the literature. Our model approximates without a systematic error the size of most of the nanopowders, both in conventional and centrifugal fluidized beds, outperforming current models. Although simple, the model is able to capture the influence of the nanoparticle size, particle density, and Hamaker coefficient on the inter-agglomerate forces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据