4.4 Article

Age-Dependent Differences in Recovered Visual Responses in Royal College of Surgeons Rats Transduced with the Channelrhodopsin-2 Gene

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 393-400

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-011-9599-y

关键词

Channelrhodopsin-2; Adeno-associated virus vector; Royal College of Surgeons rat; Visual evoked potentials

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [21791664, 21200022]
  2. Japanese Government
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  4. Japan Foundation for Aging and Health
  5. National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO)
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21200022, 21791664] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study is to investigate age-related differences in recovered visual function in Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats transduced with the Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) gene. An adeno-associated virus vector that contained ChR2 was injected intravitreously into young or aged RCS rats. After 4 months, visual evoked potentials were recorded. To estimate the transduction efficiencies, ChR2V-expressing cells and retrograde labeled retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) were counted. After photoreceptor degradation, immunohistochemistry was used to detect glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in the retinas. The amplitudes and latencies from young RCS rats were higher and shorter, respectively, than those from aged RCS rats. ChR2V was expressed in the RGCs of both groups of rats; there was no significant difference in the transduction efficiency of either group. However, the number of RGCs in aged RCS rats was significantly less than that in young RCS rats. In addition, strong GFAP immunoreactivity was observed after photoreceptor degeneration, whereas it was weaker in ChR2V-expressing RGCs. ChR2 transduction produced photosensitive RGCs in both young and aged rats. However, the degree of recovery depended on the age at the time of transduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据