4.7 Article

NMR studies of the tautomer distributions of D-fructose in lower alcohols/DMSO-d6

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 271, 期 -, 页码 926-932

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.09.067

关键词

Tautomer distribution; Lower alcohol; D-Fructose; Quantitative C-13 NMR

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1710106]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Shanxi Province (international cooperation) [201703D421041]
  3. CAS President's International Fellowship Initiative [2015VMB052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tautomer distributions of D-fructose, a popular model compound for biorefinery, in various lower alcohols and DMSO-d(6) (ROHs/DMSO-d(6)) mixtures at 298 K were investigated by quantitative C-13 NMR. The tautomer distributions of D-fructose in ethanol/DMSO-d(6) and methanol/DMSO-d(6) with different volume ratios of alcohols to DMSO-d(6) were also examined. For these normal alcohols (methanol, ethanol, n-propanol and n-butanol)/DMSO-d(6), the tautomer distribution of D-fructose in methanol/DMSO-d(6) exhibited the shortest equilibration time (46 h) and the lowest concentration of beta-furanose (39.0%) at equilibrium. The fraction of fructofuranose (alpha-furanose and beta-furanose) at equilibrium and time needed to reach equilibrium in branched chain alcohols/DMSO-d(6) obey the following order: 2-propanol/DMSO-d(6) (62.2%, 320 h) > tert-butanol/DMSO-d(6) (61.6%, 307 h) > 2-butanol/DMSO-d(6) (60.6%, 216 h) > isobutanol/DMSO-d(6) (57.8%, 134 h). For the diols/DMSO-d(6), the time for the tautomer distribution of D-fructose to reach the equilibrium was found to be: 1,4-butanediol/DMSO-d(6) (113 h) > 1,2-propanediol/DMSO-d(6) (38 h) > ethylene glycol/DMSO-d(6) (36 h). For ethanol/DMSO-d(6) and methanol/DMSO-d(6) with respectively different volume ratios, the experimental results showed that the high concentration of ethanol or methanol increases the conversion rate of tautomers. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据