4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Mutation and duplication of arthropod acetylcholinesterase: Implications for pesticide resistance and tolerance

期刊

PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 118-124

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.11.004

关键词

Acetylcholinesterase; Mutation; Duplication; Chemical defense; Resistance; Bioscavenger

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development - Rural Development Administration [PJ009365]
  2. Basic Science Research Program via National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A1A2007260]
  3. Brain Korea 21 Program
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A2007260] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of common/shared point mutations in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) confers resistance to organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides in most arthropod pests. However, the mutations associated with reduced sensitivity to insecticides usually results in the reduction of catalytic efficiency and leads to a fitness disadvantage. To compensate for the reduced catalytic activity, overexpression of neuronal AChE appears to be necessary, which is achieved by a relatively recent duplication of the AChE gene (ace) as observed in the two-spotted spider mite and other insects. Unlike the cases with overexpression of neuronal AChE, the extensive generation of soluble AChE is observed in some insects either from a distinct non-neuronal ace locus or from a single ace locus via alternative splicing. The production of soluble AChE in the fruit fly is induced by chemical stress. Soluble AChE acts as a potential bioscavenger and provides tolerance to xenobiotics, suggesting its role in chemical adaptation during evolution. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据