4.7 Article

Using satellite multispectral imagery for damage mapping of armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in maize at a regional scale

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 335-348

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4003

关键词

maize; armyworm; multispectral remote sensing; mapping; modified soil-adjusted vegetation index

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301476, 41271412]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4132029]
  3. Beijing Nova Programme, China [Z151100000315059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Armyworm, a destructive insect for maize, has caused a wide range of damage in both China and the United States in recent years. To obtain the spatial distribution of the damage area, and to assess the damage severity, a fast and accurate loss assessment method is of great importance for effective administration. The objectives of this study were to determine suitable spectral features for armyworm detection and to develop a mapping method at a regional scale on the basis of satellite remote sensing image data. RESULTS: Armyworm infestation can cause a significant change in the plant's leaf area index, which serves as a basis for infestation monitoring. Among the number of vegetation indices that were examined for their sensitivity to insect damage, the modified soil-adjusted vegetation index was identified as the optimal vegetation index for detecting armyworm. A univariate model relying on two-date satellite images significantly outperformed a multivariate model, with the overall accuracy increased from 0.50 to 0.79. CONCLUSION: A mapping method for monitoring armyworm infestation at a regional scale has been developed, based on a univariate model and two-date multispectral satellite images. The successful application of this method in a typical armyworm outbreak event in Tangshan, Hebei Province, China, demonstrated the feasibility of the method and its promising potential for implementation in practice. (C) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据