4.4 Article

TERT and AURKA Gene Copy Number Gains Enhance the Detection of Acral Lentiginous Melanomas by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 198-206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.10.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hospital Clinic de Barcelona (Ajut a la recerca Josep Font)
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Spain [PI11/02010]
  3. Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer (RTICC, FEDER) [RD12/0036/0044]
  4. Fundacion Espanola de Hematologia y Hemoterapia
  5. INBIOMED [HEMA-001/2006]
  6. Obra Social La Caixa-Fundacio Carreras

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of specific chromosomal loci through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is useful in differential diagnosis of melanocytic tumors. However, sensitivity rates vary, probably because of molecular heterogeneity. Acral Lentiginous melanomas are characterized by copy number gains of small genomic regions, including CCND1, TERT, and AURKA. In a series of 58 acral melanocytic lesions, we explored the value of a four-color FISH probe, used in addition to determining MYC gene status, and assessed the potential diagnostic usefulness of newly developed probes targeting TERT and AURKA. Moreover, we tested CCND1, TERT, and AURKA protein expression by immunohistochemistry. The four-color FISH probe detected 85.3% of melanomas and 29.4% of TERT and AURKA copy number gains. Sensitivity was 97% (confidence interval 95%, 82.9% to 99.8%) for the combined results of all probes. No MYC copy number gains were detected. No nevi showed aberrations. Immunohistochemistry revealed a higher percentage of cells positive for CCND1, TERT, and AURKA protein in melanomas than in nevi (P <= 0.001). A significant correlation between gene copy number gain and protein expression was found for CCND1 (P = 0.015). Our results indicate that addition of specific FISH probes to the current probe could improve sensitivity for the diagnosis of acral melanomas. Further studies in larger numbers of cases are needed to validate these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据