4.2 Article

Preparation and characterization of ZnO/TiO2 for the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in aqueous solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 342-43, 期 -, 页码 18-22

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2011.04.003

关键词

Hexavalent chromium; Photocatalytic reduction; ZnO/TiO2; Wetness impregnation, Interparticle electron transfer

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China [NSC-96-2628-E-011-001-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZnO/TiO2 photocatalysts coupled with various ZnO dosages (0.5-10 mol%) were prepared by wetness impregnation method and characterized in this study. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results indicated that zinc ions did not enter TiO2 lattice and was more likely to bond with oxygen atoms to form ZnO coupled on the surface of TiO2. The coupling of ZnO on the surface of TiO2 retarded the crystal phase transformation from anatase to rutile phase for TiO2 calcined at temperatures higher than 500 degrees C. The specific surface area of ZnO/TiO2 calcined at 700 degrees C was notably higher than that of pure TiO2 possibly because the aggregation and agglomeration of particles were inhibited by the indirect contact of TiO2 particles during the calcination. Photocatalytic reduction of hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), in aqueous solutions using ZnO/TiO2 was evaluated under 365 nm UV light illumination. ZnO/TiO2 containing 2.0 mol% ZnO exhibited the lowest photoluminescence emission intensity and the maximum photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in aqueous solutions due to the enhancement of charge separation by interparticle electron transfer. However, excessive ZnO on the surface of TiO2 may serve as recombination centers of electron-hole pairs to decrease the photocatalytic activity of ZnO/TiO2. Moreover, the decreased photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) using ZnO/TiO2 calcined at higher temperatures was assumed to be attributed to the decrease of specific surface areas. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据