4.2 Article

Selective oxidation of methane by molecular oxygen catalyzed by a bridged binuclear ruthenium complex at moderate pressures and ambient temperature

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 299, 期 1-2, 页码 108-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2008.10.023

关键词

Methane oxidation; Molecular oxygen; Methane monooxygenase; Bridged ruthenium complex; Kinetics

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oxidation of methane by molecular oxygen was found to be efficiently catalyzed by a binuclear bridged ruthenium complex, bis-(mu-acetato)(mu-oxo) bis-salen ruthenium (III), [L-2 Ru-2 (mu-O)(mu-CH3COO)(2)] 1 (L=Hsalen), in which methanol was observed to be formed selectively with small formation of formaldehyde at moderate total pressure 10-15 atm and at 30 degrees C in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of acetone-water solvent. In typical experiments conducted in a pressure reactor of 100 ml capacity at 30 degrees C and 15 atm pressure, 27 x 10(-3) M methanol and 2.4 x 10(-3) M formaldehyde were found to be formed with 5 x 10(-4) M catalyst. The employed partial pressures of methane and molecular oxygen in these catalytic experiments were at 10 and 5 atm, respectively. Complex I was synthesized, characterized and evaluated for catalytic oxidation of methane in detail as a function of total pressure, CH4:O-2 pressure ratio, concentration of the catalyst and the pressures of methane and molecular oxygen in which oxidation proved to be favorably effected by these parameters. The rates of the oxidation of methane to methanol were linearly increased on increasing the concentrations of the catalyst, methane and molecular oxygen under employed reaction conditions showing first order dependence kinetics in each concentration parameter. Based on the kinetics and experimental results;, a non-radical, ionic mechanism is suggested for the oxidation of methane to methanol. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据