4.7 Article

DNA Recognition by a σ54 Transcriptional Activator from Aquifex aeolicus

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 426, 期 21, 页码 3553-3568

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.08.009

关键词

DNA complex; DNA-binding domain; sequence-specific recognition; NtrC; Fis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM62163]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  3. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. US Department of Energy [DE FG05-86ER75281]
  5. National Science Foundation [DMB 86-09305 (500 MHz), BBS 87-20134 (600 MHz)]
  6. NSF [BBS 01-19304]
  7. NIH [RR15756 (800 MHz)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcription initiation by bacterial sigma(54)-polymerase requires the action of a transcriptional activator protein. Activators bind sequence-specifically upstream of the transcription initiation site via a DNA-binding domain (DBD). The structurally characterized DBDs from activators all belong to the Fis (factor for inversion stimulation) family of helix-turn-helix DNA-binding proteins. We report here structures of the free and DNA-bound forms of the DBD of NtrC4 (4DBD) from Aquifex aeolicus, a member of the NtrC family of sigma(54) activators. Two NtrC4-binding sites were identified upstream (-145 and -85 bp) from the start of the IpxC gene, which is responsible for the first committed step in lipid A biosynthesis. This is the first experimental evidence for sigma(54) regulation in IpxC expression. 4DBD was crystallized both without DNA and in complex with the - 145-binding site. The structures, together with biochemical data, indicate that NtrC4 binds to DNA in a manner that is similar to that of its close homolog, Fis. The greater sequence specificity for the binding of 4DBD relative to Fis seems to arise from a larger number of base-specific contacts contributing to affinity than for Fis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据