4.7 Article

Minicircle Performance Depending on S/MAR-Nuclear Matrix Interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 395, 期 5, 页码 950-965

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.066

关键词

minicircles; episomes; ARS assay; oriP; S/MAR

资金

  1. CliniGene Network of Excellence [LSHBCT-2006-018933]
  2. Excellence Initiative REBIRTH
  3. [SFB 738]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ideal vector for cell and tissue modification does not depend on integration but rather behaves as an independent functional unit that replicates as an episome. Based on a scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR), we have introduced, in 2006, an similar to 4-kb replicating nonviral minicircle able to exploit the cellular replication machinery in a way reminiscent of ARS vectors. Consisting of only one active transcription unit and the S/MAR, it resists silencing as it is free of prokaryotic vector parts and drug selection markers. The rate of final establishment in the nuclear architecture is moderate but comparable to Epstein-Barr virus-based episomes (<5%). Here, we demonstrate that this parameter can be improved if the host cell chromatin is opened by histone hyperacetylation. prior to transfection. It remains unaffected, however, by cell cycle position. Still, this class of episomes revealed intrinsic instability and integration after 5 months of continuous culture. In vivo evolution enabled the effective reduction of S/MAR size from 2 kb to 733 bp (resulting in a minicircle of similar to 3 kb) with largely improved stability and cloning capacity. Investigation of individual clones served to prove persistent and homogenous expression, which is ascribed to stable association with nuclear attachment sites. Optimum expression levels were shown to depend on the authentic usage of a polyadenylation site 3' from the S/MAR as anticipated by the stress-induced duplex destabilization algorithm, which finds increasing use to predict the functional parameters of these systems. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据