4.7 Article

Crystal Structure of Histidine Phosphotransfer Protein ShpA, an Essential Regulator of Stalk Biogenesis in Caulobacter crescentus

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 390, 期 4, 页码 686-698

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.023

关键词

stalk biogenesis; phosphorelay; two-component signal transduction; histidine phosphotransfer protein (HPt)

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences' Protein Structure Initiative [U54 GM074898]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  3. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  4. National Institutes of Health (National Center for Research Resources, Biomedical Technology Program
  5. National Institute of General Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell-cycle-regulated stalk biogenesis in Caulobacter crescentus is controlled by a multistep phosphorelay system consisting of the hybrid histidine kinase ShkA, the histidine phosphotransfer (HPt) protein ShpA, and the response regulator TacA. ShpA shuttles phosphoryl groups between ShkA and TacA. When phosphorylated, TacA triggers a downstream transcription cascade for stalk synthesis in an RpoN-dependent manner. The crystal structure of ShpA was determined to 1.52 angstrom resolution. ShpA belongs to a family of monomeric HPt proteins that feature a highly conserved four-helix bundle. The phosphorylatable histidine His56 is located on the surface of the helix bundle and is fully solvent exposed. One end of the four-helix bundle in ShpA is shorter compared with other characterized HN proteins, whereas the face that potentially interacts with the response regulators is structurally conserved. Similarities of the interaction surface around the phosphorylation site suggest that ShpA is likely to share a common mechanism for molecular recognition and phosphotransfer with yeast phosphotransfer protein YPD1 despite their low overall sequence similarity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据