4.7 Article

Histidine Kinase Regulation by a Cyclophilin-like Inhibitor

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 384, 期 2, 页码 422-435

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.017

关键词

bacterial signal transduction; cyclophilin; histidine kinase inhibition; small-angle scattering; neutron contrast variation

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Federation Fellowship
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER64026]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council [352434]
  4. Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering Postgraduate Research Award
  5. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
  6. U.S. Department of Commerce
  7. National Science Foundation under Agreement [DMR-0454672]
  8. Access to Major Research Facilities Programme [06/07-N-13]
  9. Australian Proteome Analysis Facility
  10. Australian Government's Major National Facilities program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sensor histidine kinase A (KinA) from Bacillus subtilis triggers a phosphorelay that activates sporulation. The antikinase KipI prevents sporulation by binding KinA and inhibiting the autophosphorylation reaction. Using neutron contrast variation, mutagenesis, and fluorescence data, we show that two KipI monomers bind via their C-domains at a conserved proline in the KinA dimerization and histidine-phosphotransfer (DHp) domain. Our crystal structure of the KipI C-domain reveals the binding motif has a distinctive hydrophobic groove formed by a five-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet; a characteristic of the cyclophilin family of proteins that bind prolines and often act as cis-trans peptidyl-prolyl isomerases. We propose that the DHp domain of KinA transmits conformational signals to regulate kinase activity via this proline-mediated interaction. Given that both KinA and KipI homologues are widespread in the bacterial kingdom, this mechanism has broad significance in bacterial signal transduction. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据