4.5 Article

Inhibition of p53 after acute myocardial infarction: Reduction of apoptosis is counteracted by disturbed scar formation and cardiac rupture

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.11.006

关键词

Myocardial infarction; p53; Pifithrin-alpha; Apoptosis; MMP-2

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EB 419/1-2]
  2. Martin Luther University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiomyocyte apoptosis, partially mediated through p53 signaling pathway, plays a crucial role in the progression of pathological remodeling and heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI). We hypothesized that pifithrin-alpha (PFTa), a synthetic p53 inhibitor, would suppress cardiac apoptosis through the disruption of p53-dependent transcriptional activation and thereby improve heart function in a mouse model of MI. In our experiments we show that PFTa blocked p53 transcriptional activity and attenuated H2O2-induced cardiac apoptosis in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Additionally, administration of PFTa in mice after acute MI in vivo led to a significant reduction of cardiomyocyte apoptosis but in parallel caused an increase of infarct size and significantly reduced 7-day survival rate. Subsequent analysis revealed significantly reduced proliferation and cell number, diminished collagen deposition, and elevated MMP-2 activity at the infarct zone of PFTa-treated hearts. In homozygous p53 deficient mice (p53(-/-)), however, PFTa treatment did not interfere with scar formation and did not increase MMP-2 activity after MI. Collectively, our data suggest that although p53-inhibition through PFTa reduces cardiomyocyte apoptosis, in the setting of acute MI this assumed beneficial effect is severely counteracted by the adverse remodeling of the infarct zone. PFTa increases MMP-2 activity in a p53-dependent manner, which seems a major contributor to instability of the forming scar and consequently leads to infarct progression and ventricular rupture. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据