4.5 Review

Targeting GSK-3 family members in the heart: A very sharp double-edged sword

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.11.020

关键词

Glycogen synthase kinase 3; Cardiac hypertrophy; Metabolism; Therapeutic potential

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL061688-11, R01 HL061688-04, R01 HL061688-05, R01 HL061688-09, R01 HL061688-13W1, R01 HL061688-14, R01 HL061688-10, R01 HL061688-03, R01 HL061688-12, R01 HL061688-08, R01 HL061688-06, R01 HL061688-02, R01 HL061688-01A1, R01 HL061688, R01 HL061688-13, R01 HL061688-07] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The GSK-3 family of serine/threonine kinases, which is comprised of two isoforms (alpha and beta), was initially identified as a negative regulator of glycogen synthase, the rate limiting enzyme of glycogen synthesis 11,2]. In the 30 years since its initial discovery, the family has been reported to regulate a host of additional cellular processes and, consequently, disease states such as bipolar disorders, diabetes, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease [3,4]. As a result, there has been intense interest on the part of the pharmaceutical industry in developing small molecule antagonists of GSK-3. Herein, we will review the roles played by GSK-3s in the heart, focusing primarily on recent studies that have employed global and tissue-specific gene deletion. We will highlight roles in various pathologic processes, including pressure overload and ischemic injury, focusing on some striking isoform-specific effects of the family. Due to space limitations and/or the relatively limited data in gene-targeted mice, we will not be addressing the family's roles in ischemic pre-conditioning or its many interactions with various pro- and anti-apoptotic factors. This article is part of a special issue entitled Key Signaling Molecules in Hypertrophy and Heart Failure. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据