4.5 Article

Induction of PDE5 and de-sensitization to endogenous NO signaling in a systemic resistance artery under altered blood flow

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.03.025

关键词

Nitric oxide; cGMP; Sildenafil; Vasorelaxation; Vascular remodeling

资金

  1. NIH [HL66171]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL066171] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the classical pathway, the opposing activities of guanylyl cyclases (GC) and phosphodiesterases (PDE), and the effect of the cGMP-dependent protein kinase (cGK) on its targets, determine the biological responses to NO signaling. Here we tested the hypothesis that vascular dysfunction may be due to altered expression and activity of these effectors of NO signaling. Every other set of rat second order mesenteric resistance arteries (MA) were ligated, resulting in chronic low flow (LF) in the upstream MA1 and high flow (HF) in the adjacent MA1 without tissue ischemia. eNOS and iNOS were up-regulated in HF and LF MA1, respectively, in the sub-acute phase (four days) of vascular remodeling. The Day4 HF/LF MA1s were under increased control of NO as indicated by reduced sensitivity to the vasoconstrictor phenylephrine and its normalization with the NOS antagonist L-NAME. PDE5 mRNA and protein were also significantly up-regulated in the HF/LF MA1 with no change in sGC or PKG1, an effect that was dependent upon NO synthesis. The PDE5 inhibitor Sildenafil was several-fold more powerful in relaxing the HF/LF MA1s, and pre-treatment with Sildenafil uncovered an increased responsiveness of HF/LF MA1s to the NO donor DEA/NO. We conclude that induction of PDE5 de-sensitizes this systemic resistance artery to sustained NO signaling under chronic HF/LF. Treatment with PDE5 antagonists, in contrast to NO donors, may more specifically and effectively increase blood flow to chronically hypo-perfused tissues. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据