4.5 Article

Cytokine expression profiling of the myocardium reveals a role for CX3CL1 (fractalkine) in heart failure

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.05.009

关键词

heart failure; inflammation; cytokine; microarray; CX3CL1; fractalkine; cardiomyocytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several lines of evidence suggest that inflammatory processes mediated by cytokines are involved in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF). However, the regulation of cytokine expression and the role of cytokines during HF development are not well understood. To address this issue, we have examined alterations in gene expression during I-IF progression by microarray technology in non-infarcted left ventricular (LV) murine tissue at various time points after myocardial infarction (MI). The highest number of regulated genes was found five days after MI. In total, we identified 14 regulated genes encoding cytokines with no previous association to H F. The strongest up-regulation was found for the chemokine fractalkine (CX3CL1). In human failing hearts we detected a 3-fold increase in CX3CL1 protein production, and both cardiomyocytes and fibrous tissue revealed immunoreactivity for CX3CL1 and its specific receptor CX3CR1. We also found that the circulating level of CX3CL1 was increased in patients with chronic HF in accordance with disease severity (1.6-fold in NYHA II, 2.2-fold in NYHA III and 2.9-fold in NYHA IV). fit vitro experiments demonstrated that CX3CL1 production could be induced by inflammatory cytokines known to be highly expressed in HE CX3CL1 itself induced the expression of markers of cardiae hypertrophy and protein phosphatases in neonatal cardiomyocytes. Given the increased CX3CL1 production in both an experimental HF model and in patients with chronic HF as well as its direct effects on cardiomyocytes, we suggest a role for CX3CL1 and its receptor CX3CR1 in the pathogenesis of HE (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据