4.3 Article

Insulin-S.O (sodium oleate) complex-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: Formulation, characterization and in vivo evaluation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROENCAPSULATION
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 471-478

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02652040903515490

关键词

insulin complex; sodium oleate; PLGA; nanoparticles; bioavailability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30472099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S.O (sodium oleate) is an anionic surfactant, which is able to forman ionic complex with positively charged insulin at suitable pH. In a previous study, the insulin-S.O (Ins-S.O) complex was prepared by a hydrophobic ion pairing (HIP) method to improve the apparent liposolubility of insulin. The formation of the complex was further confirmed by Zeta potential and X-ray method. Based on the preliminary study, poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles harbouring Ins-S.O complex was prepared via an emulsion solvent diffusion method. The effects of key parameters such as concentration of PVA, concentration of PLGA and initial-loaded drug on the properties of the nanoparticles were investigated. The insulin encapsulation efficiency (EE(%)) reached up to 91.2% and mean diameter of the nanoparticles was sized similar to 160 nm under optimal conditions. The pharmacological effects of the nanoparticles made of PLGA (75/25, Av Mw 15 000) were further evaluated to confirm their potential suitability for oral delivery. In order to evaluate hyperglycaemic effect of the nanoparticles for oral administration, Ins-S.O complex-loaded PLGA nanoparticles (20 IU/Kg) were administered orally by force-feeding to diabetic rats. In the case of the nanoparticles, the plasma glucose level reduced to 23.85% from the initial one 12h post-administration and this continued for 24 h. The results showed that the use of Ins-S.O complex-loaded PLGA nanoparticles is an effective method of reducing plasma glucose levels. The insulin nanoparticles also improved the glycaemic response to an oral glucose challenge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据