4.5 Article

A Flat Heat Pipe Architecture Based on Nanostructured Titania

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 878-884

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2010.2051019

关键词

Heat pipe; nanostructure; Thermal Ground Plane (TGP); titanium; vapor chamber

资金

  1. Microsystems Technology Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [N66001-08-1-2035]
  2. NSF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel 3 cm x 3 cm x 600 mu m-thick Ti-based flat heat pipe is developed for Thermal Ground Plane (TGP) applications. The Ti-based heat pipe architecture is constructed by laser welding two microfabricated titanium substrates to form a hermetically sealed vapor chamber. The scalable heat pipes' flat geometry facilitates contact with planar heat sources, such as microprocessor chip surfaces, thereby reducing thermal contact resistance and improving system packaging. Fluid transport is driven by the wicking structure in the TGP, which consists of an array of Ti pillars that are microfabricated from a titanium substrate using recently developed high-aspect-ratio Ti processing techniques [1]. The hydrophilic nature of the Ti pillars is increased further by growing similar to 200-nm hairlike nanostructured titania of the pillar surfaces. The resulting super hydrophilic wick offers the potential to generate high wicking velocities of similar to 27.5 mm/s over distances of 2 mm. The experimental wetting results show a diffusive spreading behavior that is predicted by Washburn dynamics [2]. The maximum effective thermal conductivity of a heat pipe is directly related to the speed of capillary flow of the working fluid through the wick and is measured experimentally in the first-generation device to be k = 350 W/m . K. A dummy TGP with a cavity volume of similar to 170 mu L was used to test the hermiticity level of the laser packaging technique. The device gave a 0.067% of water loss based on similar to 60 mu L of charged water at 100 degrees C in air for over a year. [2009-0303]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据