4.5 Article

Viscoelastic Characterization and Modeling of Polymer Transducers for Biological Applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 1087-1099

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2009.2029166

关键词

Cellular traction force; finite-element analysis (FEA); polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS); transducer; viscoelasticity

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-0826191, CMMI-0239163, CMMI-0700688]
  2. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC96-2628-E-006-006MY3]
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [0826191] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is an important polymeric material widely used in bio-MEMS devices such as micro-pillar arrays for cellular mechanical force measurements. The accuracy of such a measurement relies on choosing an appropriate material constitutive model for converting the measured structural deformations into corresponding reaction forces. However, although PDMS is a well-known viscoelastic material, many researchers in the past have treated it as a linear elastic material, which could result in errors of cellular traction force interpretation. In this paper, the mechanical properties of PDMS were characterized by using uniaxial compression, dynamic mechanical analysis, and nanoindentation tests, as well as finite element analysis (FEA). A generalized Maxwell model with the use of two exponential terms was used to emulate the mechanical behavior of PDMS at room temperature. After we found the viscoelastic constitutive law of PDMS, we used it to develop a more accurate model for converting deflection data to cellular traction forces. Moreover, in situ cellular traction force evolutions of cardiac myocytes were demonstrated by using this new conversion model. The results presented by this paper are believed to be useful for biologists who are interpreting similar physiological processes. [2008-0318]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据