4.3 Article

Overcoming the anaerobic hurdle in phenotypic microarrays: Generation and visualization of growth curve data for Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 159-168

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.10.003

关键词

Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough; Sulfate reducing bacteria; Phenotypic microarray; Omnilog; Anaerobes; Phenotype; pH stress; NaCl stress

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. Office of Science
  3. Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  4. [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing anaerobic microorganisms in phenotypic microarrays (PM) and 96-well microtiter plates is an emerging technology that allows high throughput survey of the growth and physiology and/or phenotype of cultivable microorganisms. For non-model bacteria, a method for phenotypic analysis is invaluable, not only to serve as a starting point for further evaluation, but also to provide a broad understanding of the physiology of an uncharacterized wild-type organism or the physiology/phenotype of a newly created mutant of that organism. Given recent advances in genetic characterization and targeted mutations to elucidate genetic networks and metabolic pathways, high-throughput methods for determining phenotypic differences are essential. Here we outline challenges presented in studying the physiology and phenotype of a sulfate-reducing anaerobic delta proteobacterium. Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Modifications of the commercially available OmniLog (TM) system (Hayward, CA) for experimental setup, and configuration, as well as considerations in PM data analysis are presented. Also highlighted here is data viewing software that enables users to view and compare multiple PM data sets. The PM method promises to be a valuable strategy in our systems biology approach to D. vulgaris studies and is readily applicable to other anaerobic and aerobic bacteria. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据