4.3 Article

Optimized PCR-Temporal Temperature Gel Electrophoresis compared to cultivation to assess diversity of gut microbiota in neonates

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 156-165

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.08.005

关键词

16S rRNA; Cultivation; Gut; Microbiota; Neonates; PCR-TTGE

资金

  1. ADEREMPHA (Sauzet, France)
  2. Association Perinatalite et Developpement de l'enfant (Saint-Jean de Vedas, France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temporal Temperature Gel Electrophoresis of amplified 16S rRNA gene sequences (16S rDNA PCR-TTGE) constitutes a culture-independent molecular method used to study bacterial communities. All the technical steps are crucial for quality and exhaustiveness of the results obtained by such approach. Careful optimization of the protocols used is ideally needed for each ecosystem studied. We present here the strategy used to construct an optimized protocol for a 16S rDNA PCR-TTGE-based analysis of gut microflora in neonates. Improvement of the different steps, i.e. total DNA extraction, amplification in terms of efficiency and reduction of heteroduplex formation, TTGE migration conditions and bacterial identification from TTGE patterns, was performed. The optimized protocol was used for the subsequent analysis of 14 stool samples comparatively to a culture-based method. We showed that a specifically designed ladder representative of the diversity of the studied microflora is a useful tool for the identification of bacterial taxa despite biases inherent to 16S rRNA genes, including intra-genomic heterogeneity. Cultivation and PCR-TTGE gave congruent results but cultivation was more efficient for the detection of minor populations whereas PCR-TTGE gave a more complete description of the major populations. Finally, we demonstrated the reliability, the detection sensitivity and the convenience of the optimized 16S rDNA PCR-TTGE method compared with cultural approaches for studying the premature neonate gut microbiota. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据