4.7 Article

Improved performance of cross-flow ultrafiltration for the recovery and purification of Ca2+ conditioned lipopeptides in diafiltration mode of operation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 454, 期 -, 页码 436-443

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.047

关键词

Cross-flow ultrafiltration (CFUF); Lipopeptides; Ca2+ induced micelle stabilization; Improved recovery and purification; DLS analysis

资金

  1. Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Government of India [MoES/16/48/09/RDEAS
  2. 15-07-2010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is for the first time that an attempt was made to enhance the performance of cross-flow ultrafiltration (CFUF) for the recovery and purification of lipopeptides by size-conditioning their micelles with Ca2+ ions and operating the system in diafiltration mode. In this study, polyether sulfone (PES) membranes with MWCOs 10, 30 and 50 kDa were evaluated for recovery and purification of lipopeptides produced by Bacillus sp. CFUF studies performed under batch mode showed poor recovery (68 +/- 2%) of F-2 Fraction comprising Fengycin isoforms, whereas F-1 fraction comprising a mixture of surfactin and iturin isoforms showed a moderate recovery of 83.5 +/- 2.4% in 50 kDa MWCO membrane. To improve the recovery, lipopeptides were conditioned with Ca2+ ions. The CFUF purification of this size-conditioned lipopeptide solution under diafiltration mode was carried out in 50 kDa PES membrane. Continuous irrigation of Ca2+ to lipopeptide solution under diafiltration mode of CFUF resulted in the increased recovery of lipopeptides, F1 (surfactin + iturin) fraction about 90.5 +/- 2.1% and F-2 about 95.3 +/- 2.0% Further, the colored impurities with MW range of 2334-3506 Da were effectively removed from the solution. The results of CFUF purification of Ca2+ conditioned lipopeptide solution under diafiltration mode indicate that this process can be readily scaled up to the commercial level, workable even with higher MWCO membranes. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据