4.7 Article

CF4 plasma surface modification of asymmetric hydrophilic polyethersulfone membranes for direct contact membrane distillation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 407, 期 -, 页码 164-175

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.031

关键词

Polyethersulfone; Membrane distillation; CF4 plasma; Surface modification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund China [20976083, 21176119]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB932800, 2012CB720903, 2009CB623402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes the use of CF4 plasma modification of a hydrophilic membrane into a hydrophobic one for membrane distillation. Plasma surface modification conditions were optimized with respect to plasma glow discharge power and treatment duration using a flat sheet PES membrane. The modified membranes were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), SEM, contact angle measurements, pore size distribution, liquid entry pressure and atomic force microscopy. Results revealed that the plasma modification converted hydrophilic membranes of a contact angle 0 degrees into hydrophobic ones with water contact angle above 120 degrees. Fluorination was ascribed to the wettability change of the membrane from hydrophilic to hydrophobic via insertion and possibly deposition. Direct contact membrane distillation of the hollow fibers using 4% NaCl solution yielded a water flux of 45.4 kg/m(2) h at a feed temperature of 63.3 degrees C. A rather high evaporation efficiency of the membrane distillation process was estimated in comparison with literature results. Direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) stability test showed a water flux of 42.1 kg/m(2) h using 4 wt% NaCl as feed (at the temperature of 60.5 +/- 0.2 degrees C). No leakage was observed for 54 h indicating a stable membrane performance. The high evaporation efficiency and water flux were ascribed most probably to the high porosity of the base membrane. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据