4.7 Article

Synchrotron SAXS to probe cross-linked network of polyamide 'reverse osmosis' and 'nanofiltration' membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 421, 期 -, 页码 51-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.029

关键词

Synchrotron X-ray; Small-angle scattering; Network structure; Reverse osmosis; Nanofiltration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A typical 'reverse osmosis' (RO) or 'nanofiltration' (NF) polyamide cross-linked structure is formed by interfacial reaction between an aqueous solution of m-phenylene diamine (or piperazine) and a trimesoyl chloride solution in n-hexane. Using synchrotron SAXS, it was observed that a little change in the reactant concentrations resulted to different cross-linked networks of the polyamides. A clear difference between the cross-linking networks of RU and NF polyamides was observed even though there were some similarities in terms of the nature of polymer chain compaction and the cluster formation by aggregation. In both the polyamides, there was strong compaction of polymer chains forming globular like objects having smooth interface which was well deviated from the Gaussian polymer chain nature (I infinity Q(-2)) wherein the NF polyamide had relatively more compaction with Porod scattering I infinity Q(-3.8) than I infinity Q(-3.4) of the RU polyamide. The size of the compacted globules containing about 1400 trimesamide monomeric units for the NF polyamide was slightly smaller than that of the RU polyamide. These globules were very strongly aggregated to form polymer nodules. The nodular cluster size for the NF polyamide was similar to 2000-3000 angstrom which was similar to 6-7 times larger than that of RU polyamide. These differences in the nature of polymer chain compaction and the cluster size agreed with the differences in effective cross-link density measured by equilibrium swelling in dimethyl acetamide and the polymer nodule sizes observed by the AFM. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据