4.7 Article

Evolution of ultra-thin dense-selective layer from single-layer to dual-layer hollow fibers using novel Extem® polyetherimide for gas separation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 360, 期 1-2, 页码 48-57

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.04.046

关键词

Extem (R) (polyetherimide); Membrane formation; Gas separation; Ultra-thin; Dual-layer; Rheology

资金

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF) [R-279-000-261-281]
  2. UOP
  3. BASF
  4. PBI
  5. Mitsui
  6. Merck [WBS N-279-000-010-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aims of this study are to fabricate Extem (R) hollow fibers with an ultra-thin dense-selective layer for gas separation and to use this brand new amorphous thermoplastic polyetherimide (PEI) as a model material to reveal the fundamentals of hollow fiber membrane fabrication. The evolution of membrane morphology, final dense-selective layer thickness and O-2/N-2 selectivity from single-layer to dual-layer spinning have been disclosed with an integrated understanding of dope formulation, solution rheology, elongational rate, phase inversion path and co-extrusion method. Without heat treatment, single-layer Extem (R) hollow fibers are all defective even if the silicon rubber coating is applied due to the substructure resistance. Neither changes in spinning conditions nor increase in polymer concentration could improve the O-2/N-2 selectivity of single-layer Extem (R) hollow fibers. By taking the advantages of the characteristics of rapid phase inversion, relatively lower shear and elongational viscosities, dual-layer Extem (R) hollow fibers with an O-2/N-2 selectivity of 6.15 and an ultra-thin dense-layer thickness of about 876 A have been successful fabricated for the first time since Extem (R) was commercialized in 2007. Mainly due to the formation of an ultra-thin dense layer and a porous substructure, the gas permeance of our Extem (R) hollow fibers is higher than that of Ultem (R) PEI hollow fibers reported in the literature. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据