4.1 Article

Effect of Chloride Channel Inhibitors on Cytosolic Ca2+ Levels and Ca2+-Activated K+ (Gardos) Channel Activity in Human Red Blood Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY
卷 246, 期 4, 页码 315-326

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00232-013-9532-0

关键词

Erythrocyte; DIDS; NPPB; Tannic acid; AO1; Gardos channel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DIDS, NPPB, tannic acid (TA) and AO1 are widely used inhibitors of Cl- channels. Some Cl- channel inhibitors (NPPB, DIDS, niflumic acid) were shown to affect phosphatidylserine (PS) scrambling and, thus, the life span of human red blood cells (hRBCs). Since a number of publications suggest Ca2+ dependence of PS scrambling, we explored whether inhibitors of Cl- channels (DIDS, NPPB) or of Ca2+-activated Cl- channels (DIDS, NPPB, TA, AO1) modified intracellular free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+](i)) and activity of Ca2+-activated K+ (Gardos) channel in hRBCs. According to Fluo-3 fluorescence in flow cytometry, a short treatment (15 min, +37 A degrees C) with Cl- channels inhibitors decreased [Ca2+](i) in the following order: TA > AO1 > DIDS > NPPB. According to forward scatter, the decrease of [Ca2+](i) was accompanied by a slight but significant increase in cell volume following DIDS, NPPB and AO1 treatments. TA treatment resulted in cell shrinkage. According to whole-cell patch-clamp experiments, TA activated and NPPB and AO1 inhibited Gardos channels. The Cl- channel blockers further modified the alterations of [Ca2+](i) following ATP depletion (glucose deprivation, iodoacetic acid, 6-inosine), oxidative stress (1 mM t-BHP) and treatment with Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin (1 mu M). The ability of the Cl- channel inhibitors to modulate PS scrambling did not correlate with their influence on [Ca2+](i) as TA and AO1 had a particularly strong decreasing effect on [Ca2+](i) but at the same time enhanced PS exposure. In conclusion, Cl- channel inhibitors affect Gardos channels, influence Ca2+ homeostasis and induce PS exposure of hRBCs by Ca2+-independent mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据