4.7 Article

Synthesis and Kinetic Evaluation of Cyclophostin and Cyclipostins Phosphonate Analogs As Selective and Potent Inhibitors of Microbial Lipases

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 55, 期 22, 页码 10204-10219

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm301216x

关键词

-

资金

  1. EGIDE
  2. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  3. CNRS
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche Francaise [ANR-07-PCVI-0009, ANR MIEN 2009-00904 FOAMY_TUB]
  5. LISA Carnot Institute [ANR 07-CARN-009-01]
  6. National Institute of General Medical Studies [R01-GM076192]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Sciences Materials Sciences Division [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-07-PCVI-0009] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new series-of customizable diastereomeric cis- and trans-monocyclic enol-phosphonate analogs to Cyclophostin and Cyclipostins were synthesized. Their potencies and mechanisms of inhibition. toward six representative lipolytic enzymes belonging to distinct lipase families Were examined. With Mammalian gastric and pancreatic lipases no inhibition occurred with any of the compounds tested. Conversely, Fusarium solani Cutinase and. lipases from, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Rv0183 and LipY) were all fully. inactivated. The best inhibitors displayed a cis conformation (H and OMe) and exhibited higher inhibitory activities than the lipase inhibitor Orlistat toward the same enzymes. Our results have revealed that chemical group at the gamma-carbon the phosphonate ring strongly impacts the inhibitory efficiency, leading to a significant improvement in selectivity toward a target lipase over another. The powerful and selective inhibition of microbial (fungal and mycobacterial) lipases suggests that these seven-membered monocyclic enol-phosphonates should provide useful leads for the development of novel and highly selective antimicrobial agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据