4.7 Article

Epstein-Barr Virus BZLF1 Gene Promoter Variants in Pediatric Patients With Acute Infectious Mononucleosis: Its Comparison With Pediatric Lymphomas

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 81, 期 11, 页码 1912-1917

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21616

关键词

BZLF1 variants; Epstein-Barr virus; pediatric infectious mononucleosis; pediatric lymphoma

类别

资金

  1. National Agency for Science and Technology Promotion PICT [38217]
  2. National Research Council (CONICET)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epstein-Barr virus genotypes can be distinguished by polymorphic variations in the genes encoding EBNA2, 3A, 3B, and 3C. The immediate early gene BZLF1 plays a key role in modulating the switch from latency to lytic replication and therefore enabling viral propagation. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare BZLF1 promoter sequence (Zp) variation in pediatric infectious mononucleosis (IM) and in pediatric EBV positive lymphoma biopsies. Zp was sequenced from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and throat swabs from 10 patients with IM at the time of diagnosis (DO) and during convalescence; and from 13 lymphoma biopsies. Zp - P and Zp - V3 variants were found in eight and one IM patients, as well as in five and six tumor biopsies, respectively. A correlation between viral genotype and Zp variant was found significant for Zp - V3 and EBV2 (P=0.0002). One IM patient harbored two concomitant Zp variants. Regardless of anatomical compartment or stage of disease all IM patients displayed the same Zp variant along the course of the study. No new infections or aclaptative selection of different variants was evidenced. A new Zp variant (Zp-V3+49) was described in two Hodgkin lymphomas, but not in IM. This is the first study to describe Zp variants compartmentalization in children with acute EBV infection and convalescence in a developing country; and comparing them with Zp variants in pediatric lymphomas from the same geographic area. J. Med. Virol. 81:1912-1917, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据