4.3 Article

Inhibition of the cytotoxic effect of Clostridium difficile in vitro by Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 strain

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 11, 页码 1617-1625

出版社

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.033423-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEXT: The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology for Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21590492, 23590518] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In contrast to most modern pharmaceuticals, probiotics are used in many parts of the world with little or no research data on the complex system of interactions that each strain may elicit in the human body. Research on probiotics has recently become more significant, as probiotics have begun to be prescribed by clinicians as an alternative for some gut infections, especially when antibiotics are contraindicated. This study attempted to elucidate the inhibitory interaction between the Japanese probiotic strain Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (CBM588) and the hospital pathogen Clostridium difficile, which is responsible for a large proportion of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and colitis. CBM588 has previously shown effectiveness against C. difficile in vivo, and here it was found that the toxicity of C. difficile in in vitro co-culture with CBM588 was greatly decreased or absent. This was dependent on the inoculation ratio and was not accounted for by the small degree of growth and mRNA inhibition observed. CBM588 and its cell-free supernatant also had no effect on toxin already secreted into the culture medium, and culture of the two strains separated by a semi-permeable membrane resulted in loss of the inhibition. Therefore, it was concluded that the detoxification probably occurred by the inhibition of toxin protein production and that this required close proximity or contact between the two species. The low-pH conditions caused by organic acid secretion were also observed to have inhibitory effects on C. difficile growth, metabolism and toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据