标题
Animated Randomness, Avatars, Movement, and Personalization in Risk Graphics
作者
关键词
-
出版物
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages e80
出版商
JMIR Publications Inc.
发表日期
2014-03-18
DOI
10.2196/jmir.2895
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Communicating global cardiovascular risk: Are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
- (2013) Jorge G. Ruiz et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- The 2011 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension: Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, and Therapy
- (2012) Doreen M. Rabi et al. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Animated Graphics for Comparing Two Risks: A Cautionary Tale
- (2012) Brian J Zikmund-Fisher et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Conceptual, Methodological, and Ethical Problems in Communicating Uncertainty in Clinical Evidence
- (2012) Paul K. J. Han MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
- Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: Individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.
- (2011) Wolfgang Gaissmaier et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- Representing randomness in the communication of individualized cancer risk estimates: Effects on cancer risk perceptions, worry, and subjective uncertainty about risk
- (2011) Paul K.J. Han et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Presenting Research Risks and Benefits to Parents
- (2010) Alan R. Tait et al. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
- Evaluation of a cardiovascular disease risk assessment tool for the promotion of healthier lifestyles
- (2010) Anastasia Soureti et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION
- Effect of Arrangement of Stick Figures on Estimates of Proportion in Risk Graphics
- (2010) Jessica S. Ancker et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Effects of Game-Like Interactive Graphics on Risk Perceptions and Decisions
- (2010) Jessica S. Ancker et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Do Icon Arrays Help Reduce Denominator Neglect?
- (2010) Rocio Garcia-Retamero et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- A Clustering Approach to Segmenting Users of Internet-based Risk Calculators
- (2010) C. A. Harle et al. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE
- Who proficts from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks
- (2010) Rocio Garcia-Retamero et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Does Your iPodReallyPlay Favorites?
- (2009) Amy G. Froelich et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Perception of cardiovascular risk and comparison with actual cardiovascular risk
- (2009) Heba Alwan et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION
- Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: Overcoming low numeracy.
- (2009) Mirta Galesic et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- When too heavy is just fine: Creating trustworthy e-health advisors
- (2009) H.C. van Vugt et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES
- Anchoring-and-Adjustment Bias in Communication of Disease Risk
- (2009) Ibrahim Senay et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.
- (2009) Valerie F. Reyna et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics
- (2008) Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher et al. CANCER
- General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care
- (2008) Ralph B. D’Agostino et al. CIRCULATION
- Discussing Coronary Risk with Patients to Improve Blood Pressure Treatment: Secondary Results from the CHECK-UP Study
- (2008) Steven A. Grover et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices
- (2008) Sarah T. Hawley et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Effect on smoking quit rate of telling patients their lung age: the Step2quit randomised controlled trial
- (2008) Gary Parkes et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started