4.5 Article

Histone acetylation deficits in lymphoblastoid cell lines from patients with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 66-74

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100354

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italy-Spain bilateral MIUR [IT08143C4F, HI2007-0203]
  2. ASM (Associazione Studio Malformazioni)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BFU2008-00611, CSD2007-00023, SAF2008-03194-E]
  4. Fundacion Ramon Areces

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RSTS) is a congenital neurodevelopmental disorder defined by postnatal growth deficiency, characteristic skeletal abnormalities and mental retardation and caused by mutations in the genes encoding for the transcriptional co-activators with intrinsic lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) activity CBP and p300. Previous studies have shown that neuronal histone acetylation is reduced in mouse models of RSTS. Methods The authors identified different mutations at the CREBBP locus and generated lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from nine patients with RSTS carrying distinct CREBBP mutations that illustrate different grades of the clinical severity in the spectrum of the syndrome. They next assessed whether histone acetylation levels were altered in these cell lines. Results The comparison of CREBBP-mutated RSTS cell lines with cell lines derived from patients with an unrelated mental retardation syndrome or healthy controls revealed significant deficits in histone acetylation, affecting primarily histone H2B and histone H2A. The most severe defects were observed in the lines carrying the whole deletion of the CREBBP gene and the truncating mutation, both leading to a haploinsufficiency state. Interestingly, this deficit was rescued by treatment with an inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDACi). Conclusions The authors' results extend to humans the seminal observations in RSTS mouse models and point to histone acetylation defects, mainly involving H2B and H2A, as relevant molecular markers of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据