4.3 Article

Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Relationships Between Species of the Genus Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) From Brazil Inferred From the Cytochrome c Oxidase I Mitochondrial Gene

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 272-279

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/ME09293

关键词

Culex; taxonomy; phylogeny; COI; species complex

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [05/50225-2, 05/53973-0]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Tecnico e Cientifico [CNPq BPP 300351/2008-9]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [05/50225-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species of the genus Culex Linnaeus have been incriminated as the main vectors of lymphatic filariases and are important vectors of arboviruses, including West Nile virus. Sequences corresponding to a fragment of 478 bp of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene, which includes part of the barcode region, of 37 individuals of 17 species of genus Culex were generated to establish relationships among five subgenera, Culex, Phenacomyia, Melanoconion, Microculex, and Carrollia, and one species of the genus Lutzia that occurs in Brazil. Bayesian methods were employed for the phylogenetic analyses. Results of sequence comparisons showed that individuals identified as Culex dolosus, Culex mollis, and Culex imitator possess high intraspecific divergence (3.1, 2.3, and 3.5%, respectively) when using the Kimura two parameters model. These differences were associated either with distinct morphological characteristics of the male genitalia or larval and pupal stages, suggesting that these may represent species complexes. The Bayesian topology suggested that the genus and subgenus Culex are paraphyletic relative to Lutzia and Phenacomyia, respectively. The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequences may be a useful tool to both estimate phylogenetic relationships and identify morphologically similar species of the genus Culex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据