4.2 Article

Cervical cerclage and type of suture material: a survey of UK consultants' practice

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 15, 页码 1584-1588

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.870551

关键词

Cervical incompetence; monofilament/non-braided sutures; multifilament/braided sutures; preterm birth

资金

  1. National Institute Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The main aim of the survey was to explore current practices with regards to cervical cerclage procedures amongst UK consultants with particular emphasis on the type of suture material used. Methods: An electronic survey of UK consultant members and fellows of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and who previously agreed to be contacted for survey purposes. Results: There were 261 respondents to the survey and 88% routinely performed cerclage. The majority performed the procedure between 12 and 16 weeks' gestation (88.7%; n = 180/203), following the McDonald technique (83.4%; n = 166/199) and using a braided suture material (86.6%; n = 175/202). Although only 27 of the 202 responders (13.4%) used a monofilament suture for cerclage (75%; n = 149/201) of clinicians stated that they were not sure what is the best suture material to be used. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in practice amongst Consultant obstetricians with regards to cervical cerclage. Although most respondents use the traditional braided suture material, a significant proportion of them were not sure what is the best suture material to use. The gestation at delivery rate was judged to be the most important outcome for a future study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据