4.6 Article

Insights into the stability and thermal degradation of P3HT:C60 blended films for solar cell applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 46, 期 14, 页码 4942-4952

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-011-5408-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST)
  2. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) [HGER-A7S]
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper demonstrates the changes in the nanoscale morphology of the blended films induced by a diffusion of C-60 molecules and degradation during longer thermal treatment above the glass transition temperature (130 A degrees C). The results showed that the film morphology, including the size and population of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) crystallites, rapidly reduced with annealing time. A large-scale (> 1 mu m) C-60 aggregation, demonstrating a bulky phase separation between the polymer and C-60, was identified after 5 h annealing, which resulted in a degradation of charge carrier mobility and conductivity. X-ray diffraction verifies that the interchain packing of P3HT within the crystallized phase improved with an increasing in annealing time, but the volume fraction of the P3HT (100) phase normal to substrate increased up to 3 h and decreased at longer annealing times resulting in the ageing of the films. Changes in the infrared spectra of the extended annealed samples were recorded and the oxidation products were identified. A degradation mechanism that accounted for the modifications in the infrared spectra and a detachment of the hexyl chain from P3HT was demonstrated, resulting in chain cutting, conjugation loss and a reduction in the UV-vis absorbance. The morphology change with the annealing time resulted in an abrupt decrease in the PCE of P3HT:C-60 solar cells. These findings signify that the stability of P3HT:C-60 solar cells cannot be secured for longer annealing period owing to the unsettled morphology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据