4.4 Article

ATG16L1 T300A Polymorphism is Correlated with Gastric Cancer Susceptibility

期刊

PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 317-322

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-015-0006-9

关键词

Gastric cancer; Autophagy; ATG16L1 gene; Polymorphism; Gene expression

资金

  1. European Social Found, Human Resources Development Operational Programme [POSDRU/159/1.5/S/133377]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastric cancer is a major leading cause of cancer-related death in both sexes in Europe. The role of autophagy process in carcinogenesis remains unclear and there is increasing evidence that Helicobacter pylori is a key player in modulating autophagy in gastric carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to assess the potential association of ATG16L1 T300A polymorphism with susceptibility of gastric cancer, and further to analyze the expression profile of ATG16L1 gene in paired tumoral and peritumoral gastric tissue. A total of 108 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and 242 healthy controls were enrolled. ATG16L1 T300A polymorphism was detected using TaqMan genotyping assay containing primers and specific probes for A and G allele, respectively. ATG16L1 mRNA level was evaluated in 34 paired tumoral and peritumoral tissues using qRT-PCR. We found a significant association for both carriers of AG (OR 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.30-0.91, p = 0.02) and GG genotype (OR 0.53, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.98, p = 0.043), these were at a lower risk for gastric cancer when compared with the wild-type AA genotype. The strongest association was observed in a dominant model, the carriers of G allele were protected against gastric cancer (OR 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.13-0.88, p = 0.013). In a stratified analyse, the association was limited to non-cardia type and intestinal type. ATG16L1 gene expression was detected in both tumor and peritumoral tissues, with the mRNA-ATG16L1 levels significantly higher in tumor sample. Our results suggest that ATG16L1 T300A polymorphism may be associated with gastric carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据