4.6 Article

Fabrication of parts and their evaluation using a dual laser in the solid freeform fabrication system

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 209, 期 10, 页码 4857-4866

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.01.005

关键词

Solid freeform fabrication system; Dual laser; Scan path; Selective laser sintering

资金

  1. Korea Foundation for International Cooperation of Science & Technology (KICOS) through a grant provided by the Korean Ministry of Education Science & Technology (MEST) in 2009 [M60602000002-06E0200-00210]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-00509, 과06B2406] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A solid freeform fabrication (SFF) system using selective laser sintering (SLS) is currently recognized as a leading process for SLS extended application to machinery and automobiles, whose production involves the use of various materials. For the fabrication of a large surface using the SFF system, the dual-laser approach has been introduced in this paper. Since the building room is divided into two regions, each scan path for the dual-laser system is generated based on a single-laser scan path. The scan paths for both lasers have to be synchronized, and the mechanical strength of the large surface must be considered to prevent fracture at the interface region. This paper addresses the generation of a single-laser scan path for special cases such as those involving unnecessary scan points, and the generation of a dual-laser scan path according to various divided regions so to enhance the mechanical strength of the large surface. Moreover, the tensile strength of the specimen manufactured through single-laser scan path system has been compared with the specimen manufacture through dual-laser scan path and the effect of overlapping region with respect to tensile strength is also highlighted. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据