4.6 Article

Factors Affecting Improvement of Engineering Properties of MICP-Treated Soil Catalyzed by Bacteria and Urease

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001013

关键词

Calcium; Bacteria; Soil stabilization; Enzymes; Microbial induced; Calcium carbonate precipitation; Microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP); Bacteria; Urease; Soil improvement

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1039502]
  2. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Recycled Materials Resource Center (RMRC)
  3. China Scholarship Council [2011640038]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1039502] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) is one of the potential methods for improvement of engineering properties of soil. A laboratory study was conducted to investigate the influence of various factors on engineering properties of MICP-treated soil catalyzed by bacteria and ureases. Some of these factors include bacteria concentration, urease concentration, cementation media concentration, reaction time, type of sand, and curing conditions. The experiments of MICP catalyzed by Sporosarcina pasteurii and urease were conducted in similar conditions. The soil samples were prepared with full contact flexible molds (FCFMs). The results of unconfined compression test show that the experimental factors (bacteria/urease concentration, cementation media concentration, reaction time, and type of sand) have a significant impact on the MICP process and engineering properties of sand treated by both bacteria and urease, whereas the curing conditions has a small effect. The unconfined compression strength (approximately 1.76-2.04MPa) of bacteria treated samples is almost 5x (approximately 0.33-0.43MPa) that of urease treated samples under similar urease activity. The MICP process catalyzed by bacteria is much more effective than the process catalyzed by urease in terms of engineering soil properties improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据