4.3 Article

Improvement of the wet tensile properties of nanostructured hydroxyapatite and chitosan biocomposite films through hydrophobic modification

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 2330-2337

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0jm03080e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Functional Nanomaterials, Australia
  2. ARC [FF0455861]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrophobic modification of chitosan/hydroxyapatite composites and chitosan films was performed using four n-alkyl acids with varying alkyl chain lengths (6 to 16 carbons), and these films were characterized for their hydrophobicity and tensile properties under wet conditions. Grafting was performed by a heterogeneous reaction in a 2.0 mol L-1 DMF solution of the acid at 80 degrees C for either one or five days. Characterisation by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) verified the introduction of amide functionalities and alkyl chains. The degree of substitution (DS) ranged from 2-5% for the composite films (based on XPS N 1s narrow scans) reflecting the heterogeneous nature of the reaction. Water contact angle measurements and the tensile testing under wet conditions showed, in general, that the grafting time and alkyl chain length had little effect on the surface hydrophobicity and the tensile properties of films, respectively. However, these modifications had a pronounced effect on decreasing the water content of the films, suggesting that the grafting had occurred in the bulk of the film for longer grafting times. In contrast, the tensile properties of the grafted composite films were significantly improved relative to non-grafted films and a modulus of 393 +/- 68 MPa and an UTS of 18.7 +/- 1.5 MPa were reached for composite films grafted for one day. This study provides a simple method to improve the wet tensile properties of chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite films making them more suitable for biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据